Referencias bibliográficas | 🎱 El átomo químico | Joseleg

[Ciencias de Joseleg] [Química] [La materia] [El átomo químico] [Ejercicios resueltos] [Introducción] [Generalidades] [El atomismo filosófico] [Introducción a las leyes ponderales] [Ley de la conservación de la masa] [Ley de las proporciones definidas] [Ley de las proporciones recíprocas] [Ley de las proporciones múltiples] [Teoría atómica de Dalton] [Postulado de composición] [Postulado de identidad atómica] [Postulado de identidad molecular] [Postulado de asociación] [Postulado de la ecuación química] [Pesos atómicos] [La hipótesis de Avogadro] [La técnica de Cannizzaro] [Del molécula-gramo al mol] [Del mol a la cantidad de sustancia] [Historia de la teoría cinética] [Modelo matemático de la teoría cinética] [Estequiometría de composición] [Ley de Dulong y Petit] [Referencias]

---

Barrotta, P. (2000). Scientific Dialectics in Action. Scientific Controversies: Philosophical and Historical Perspectives, 153.

Bedini, S. A. (1965). Weighing and Its Instruments: Scales and Weights: A Historical Outline (Yale Studies in the History of Science and Medicine, vol. 1). Bruno Kisch. Yale University Press, New Haven, Conn., 1965. xxi+ 297 pp. Illus. $15. Science, 150(3693), 203–204.

Bell, J. A. (2005). Chemistry: A General Chemistry Project of the American Chemical Society. (American Chemical Society, Ed.) (1st ed.). Freeman.

Beretta, M. (2014). Between the workshop and the laboratory: Lavoisier’s network of instrument makers. Osiris, 29(1), 197–214.

Beretta, M., & Brenni, P. (2022a). Lavoisier’s Approach to Chemical Instrument Making. In The Arsenal of Eighteenth-Century Chemistry (pp. 18–49). Brill.

Beretta, M., & Brenni, P. (2022b). The Arsenal of Eighteenth-Century Chemistry: The Laboratories of Antoine Laurent Lavoisier (1743-1794). Brill.

Bernal, A., & Daza, E. E. (2010). On the epistemological and ontological status of chemical relations. HYLE–International Journal for Philosophy of Chemistry, 16(2), 80–103.

Bernatowicz, A. J. (1970). Dalton’s rule of simplicity. Journal of Chemical Education, 47(8), 577.

Bigg, C. (2008). Evident atoms: Visuality in Jean Perrin’s Brownian motion research. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part A, 39(3), 312–322.

Blanco, D. (2012). Aristas controversiales en la caja negra de Darwin. Lógoi, (8).

Bose, S. K. (2015). The atomic hypothesis. Current Science, 108(5), 998–1002.

Boyle, R. (1911). The Sceptical Chymist: The Classic 1661 Text. Courier Dover Publications.

Brady, J. E., & Humiston, G. E. (1986). General Chemistry: Principles and Structure. Wiley & Sons.

Brown, T. L., LeMay, H. E. J., Bursten, B. E., Murphy, C. J., & Woodward, P. (2009). Chemistry the central science (11th ed.). Pearson; Prentice Hall.

Brown, T. L., LeMay, H. E. J., Bursten, B. E., Murphy, C. J., Woodward, P. M., & Stoltzfus, M. W. (2017). Chemistry, the central science (13th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Burwell Jr, R. L. (1894). Heterogeneous catalysis before 1934. Catalysis, (2).

Büttner, J., & Renn, J. (2016). The early history of weighing technology from the perspective of a theory of innovation. ETopoi: Journal for Ancient Studies, 6, 757–776.

Cercignani, C. (2000). Ludwig Boltzmann: the man who trusted atoms. American Association of Physics Teachers.

Chang, R. (2010). Chemistry (10th ed.). McGraw-Hill New York.

Chang, R., & Overby, J. (2011). General Chemistry,Th e Essential Concepts (11th ed.). McGraw-Hill New York.

Clary, D. C. (2013). 100 Years of Atomic Theory. Science, 341(6143), 244–245.

Clausius, R. (1857). Ueber die Art der Bewegung, welche wir Wärme nennen. Annalen Der Physik, 176(3), 353–380.

Clericuzio, A. (2000). Elements, principles and corpuscles: A study of atomism and chemistry in the seventeenth century (Vol. 171). Springer.

Colyvan, M. (1998). In defence of indispensability. Philosophia Mathematica, 6(1), 39–62.

Cornford, F. M. (2000). Plato’s cosmology: the Timaeus of Plato (Vol. 4). Psychology Press.

Dalton, J. (1805). On the absorption of gases by water and other liquids. S. Russell.

Dalton, J. (2010). A new system of chemical philosophy (Vol. 1). Cambridge University Press.

Darmstaedter, L., & Oesper, R. E. (1928). Jeremias Benjamin Richter. Journal of Chemical Education, 5(7), 785.

Daubeny, C. (1850). Supplement to the Introduction to the atomic theory: comprehending a sketch of certain opinions and discoveries bearing upon the general principles of chemical philosophy, which have been brought into notice since the publication of that work. University Press.

de Andrade Martins, R. (n.d.). A PRIORI COMPONENTS OF SCIENCE: LAVOISIER AND THE LAW OF CONSERVATION OF MASS IN CHEMICAL REACTIONS.

Dijksterhuis, E. J., & Dikshoorn, C. (1969). The mechanization of the world picture. Oxford University Press Oxford.

Donovan, A. (1996). Antoine Lavoisier: Science, administration and revolution (Vol. 5). Cambridge University Press.

Einstein, A. (1905). Über die von der molekularkinetischen Theorie der Wärme geforderte Bewegung von in ruhenden Flüssigkeiten suspendierten Teilchen. Annalen Der Physik, 4.

Eliade, M., & Ledesma, M. P. (1974). Herreros y alquimistas. Alianza Madrid.

Ferguson, L. (2015). Control Systems as Used by the Ancient World.

Flamm, D. (1997). Ludwig Boltzmann--A Pioneer of Modern Physics. ArXiv Preprint Physics/9710007.

Fujii, K. (1986). The Berthollet-Proust Controversy and Dalton’s Chemical Atomic Theory 1800-1820. The British Journal for the History of Science, 177–200.

Garber, D. (1987). How God causes motion: Descartes, divine sustenance, and occasionalism. JSTOR.

Glausser, W. (1991). Atomistic Simulacra in the Enlightenment and in Blake’s Post-Enlightenment. The Eighteenth Century, 73–88.

Golinski, J. (1994). Precision instruments and the demonstrative order of proof in Lavoisier’s chemistry. Osiris, 9, 30–47.

Guggenheim, E. A. (1961). The mole and related quantities. Journal of Chemical Education, 38(2), 86. Retrieved from https://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ed038p86

Gusev, A. I. (2014). Nonstoichiometry and superstructures. Physics-Uspekhi, 57(9), 839.

Gyenis, B. (2017). Maxwell and the normal distribution: A colored story of probability, independence, and tendency toward equilibrium. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics, 57, 53–65.

Hartog, P. J. (1894). The Berthollet-Proust Controversy and the Law of Definite Proportions. Nature, 50(1285), 149–150.

Haw, M. (2005). Einstein’s random walk. Physics World, 18(1), 19–22.

Hesse, J. J., & Anderson, C. W. (1992). Students’ conceptions of chemical change. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(3), 277–299.

Holmes, F. L. (1985). Lavoisier and the chemistry of life: An exploration of scientific creativity. Univ of Wisconsin Press.

IUPAC. (2019). Compendium of Chemical Terminology the “Gold Book.” (S. J. Chalk, Ed.) (2nd ed.). Compiled by A. D. McNaught and A. Wilkinson. Blackwell Scientific Publications, Oxford. Retrieved from http://goldbook.iupac.org/

Jensen, W. B. (2019). Hans Landolt and the Conservation of Mass: Notes from the Oesper Collections, No. 55, March/April 2019.

Jespersen, N. D., Brady, J. E., & Hyslop, A. (2012). Chemistry The Molecular Nature of Matter (6th ed.). Wiley Online Library.

Kapoor, S. C. (1965). Berthollet, Proust, and proportions. Chymia, 10, 53–110.

Kauffman, G. B. (1994). Before and After Cannizzaro: A Philosophical Commentary on the Development of the Atomic and Molecular Theories. American Scientist, 82(4), 395–397.

Kirk, G. S., Raven, J. E., & Schofield, M. (1983). The presocratic philosophers: A critical history with a selection of texts. Cambridge university press.

Krönig, A. (1856). Grundzüge einer theorie der gase.

Kulikovsky, A. A. (2004). The effect of stoichiometric ratio λ on the performance of a polymer electrolyte fuel cell. Electrochimica Acta, 49(4), 617–625.

Lakatos, I. (1978). The methodology of scientific research programmes. Cambridge University Press.

Lennon, T. M. (1993). The battle of the gods and giants: the legacies of Descartes and Gassendi, 1655-1715. Princeton University Press Princeton.

Lennon, T. M. (2014). The battle of the gods and giants: the legacies of Descartes and Gassendi, 1655-1715. Princeton University Press.

Leroux, G. (1992). The Hellenistic Philosophers Volume 1: Translations of the Principal Sources with Philosophical Commentary Volume 2: Greek and Latin Texts with Notes and BibliographyA. A. Long et DN Sedley Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, 1987, vol. 1, xvi, 512 p.; Dialogue: Canadian Philosophical Review/Revue Canadienne de Philosophie, 31(1), 121–123.

Levere, T. H. (1990). Lavoisier: Language, instruments, and the chemical revolution. In Nature, Experiment, and the Sciences (pp. 207–223). Springer.

Levere, T. H. (2001). Transforming matter: a history of chemistry from alchemy to the buckyball. JHU Press.

Lloyd, G. E. R. (2012). Early greek science: Thales to Aristotle. Random House.

Lloyd, G. E. R., & Lloyd, G. E. (1968). Aristotle: the growth and structure of his thought. Cambridge University Press Cambridge.

Maddox, J. (2002). Maxwell’s demon: Slamming the door. Nature, 417(6892), 903.

Mahon, B. (2004). The man who changed everything: the life of James Clerk Maxwell. John Wiley & Sons.

Maleeh, R., & Amani, P. (2013). Pragmatism, Bohr, and the Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics. International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 27(4), 353–367.

Malone, A., Sagan, C., Druyan, A., & Soter, S. (1980). Cosmos: A Personal Voyage: The Lives of the Stars. United States: PBS.

Marquardt, R. (2019). The mole and IUPAC: a brief history. Chemistry International, 41(3), 50–52.

Matamála, M., & Gonzalez, P. (1976). Química General. Cultural.

Maxwell, J C. (1860). On the Motions and Collisions of Perfectly Elastic Spheres. 19.

Maxwell, James Clerk. (1860). II. Illustrations of the dynamical theory of gases. The London, Edinburgh, and Dublin Philosophical Magazine and Journal of Science, 20(130), 21–37.

Maxwell, James Clerk. (1867). IV. On the dynamical theory of gases. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, (157), 49–88.

Meinel, C. (1988). Early Seventeenth-Century Atomism: Theory, Epistemology, and the Insufficiency of Experiment. Isis, 68–103.

Michałowska-Kaczmarczyk, A. M., Asuero, A. G., & Michałowski, T. (2015). “Why Not Stoichiometry” versus “Stoichiometry—Why Not?” Part I: General Context. Critical Reviews in Analytical Chemistry, 45(2), 166–188.

Milton, M. J. T. (2011). A new definition for the mole based on the Avogadro constant: a journey from physics to chemistry. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. A, 369(1953), 3993–4003. Retrieved from https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/pdf/10.1098/rsta.2011.0176

Münzenberg, G. (2013). Development of mass spectrometers from Thomson and Aston to present. International Journal of Mass Spectrometry, 349, 9–18.

Nash, L. K. (1956). The origin of Dalton’s chemical atomic theory. Isis, 101–116.

Newton, I. (1718). Opticks (2003rd ed.). Prometheus Books.

Norwood, G. (1950). Interruptions. The Classical Bulletin, 27(1), 1.

Ollis, W. D. (1972). Models and Molecules. Proceedings of the Royal Institution of Great Britain, 45, 1–31.

Padilla, K., & Furio-Mas, C. (2008). The importance of history and philosophy of science in correcting distorted views of ‘amount of substance’and ‘mole’concepts in chemistry teaching. Science & Education, 17(4), 403–424. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Kira-Padilla/publication/225927861_The_Importance_of_History_and_Philosophy_of_Science_in_Correcting_Distorted_Views_of_%27Amount_of_Substance%27_and_%27Mole%27_Concepts_in_Chemistry_Teaching/links/5563b91808ae9963a11e

Pais, A. (1991). Niels Bohr’s times: in physics, philosophy, and polity. Clarendon Press Oxford.

Paneth, F. A. (2003). The epistemological status of the chemical concept of element. Foundations of Chemistry, 5(2), 113–145.

Park, J.-C., Kim, D., Lee, C.-S., & Kim, D.-K. (1999). A new synthetic route to wüstite. BULLETIN-KOREAN CHEMICAL SOCIETY, 20, 1005–1009.

Perrin, J. (1901). Les hypothèses moléculaires. Revue Scientifique, 15, 449–461.

Perrin, J. (1909). Mouvement brownien et réalité moléculaire. In Annales de Chimie et de Physique (Vol. 18, pp. 5–104). Retrieved from https://djalil.chafai.net/docs/M2/history-brownian-motion/Perrin - 1909 - French.pdf

Perrin, J. (1911). La réalité des molécules. Revue Scientifique, 25(16), 774–784.

Perrin, J. (1913). Les atomes. Alcan.

Petrucci, R. H., Herring, F. G., Madura, J. D., & Bissonnette, C. (2010). General Chemistry Principles and Modern Applications (10th ed.). Pearson.

Petruso, K. M. (1981). Early weights and weighing in Egypt and the Indus Valley. M Bulletin (Museum of Fine Arts, Boston), 79, 44–51.

Piazza, R. (2018). The strange case of Dr. Petit and Mr. Dulong. ArXiv Preprint ArXiv:1807.02270.

Pismen, L. (2018). The Swings of Science: From Complexity to Simplicity and Back. Springer.

Planck, M. (1896). Gegen die neuere Energetik. Annalen Der Physik, 293(1), 72–78.

Pohle, W. (1971). The mathematical Foundations of Plato’s atomic Physics. Isis, 36–46.

Pomper, P. (1962). Lomonosov and the Discovery of the Law of the Conservation of Matter in Chemical Transformations. Ambix, 10(3), 119–127.

Ponomarev, L. I., & Kurchatov, I. V. (1993). The quantum dice. CRC Press.

Rodgers, G. E. (2019). Questioning the reality of Atoms on the ground: Loschmidt, mach, boltzmann, and ostwald (germany and Austria). Traveling with the Atom: A Scientific Guide to Europe and Beyond, 244.

Roscoe, H. E., & Harden, A. (1896). A New View of the Origin of Dalton’s Atomic Theory: A Contribution to Chemical History, Together with Letters and Documents Concerning the Life and Labours of John Dalton, Now for the First Time Published from Manuscript in the Possession of the Literary . Macmillan and Company.

Sabra, A. I. (1981). Theories of light, from Descartes to Newton. CUP Archive.

Stock, M., Davis, R., de Mirandés, E., & Milton, M. J. T. (2019). The revision of the SI—the result of three decades of progress in metrology. Metrologia, 56(2), 22001.

Swackhamer, G. (2005). Cognitive resources for understanding energy.

Thomson, T. (1820). A System of Chemistry: In Four Volumes (Vol. 1). Baldwin, Cradock, and Joy.

Usitalo, S. (2013). The invention of Mikhail Lomonosov: a Russian national myth. Academic Studies Press.

Van Melsen, A. G. (2004). From atomos to atom: The history of the concept atom. Courier Dover Publications.

Verdejo, M. E. (2012). La realidad última: átomos y vínculos sustanciales. Eikasia: Revista de Filosofía, (43), 47–60.

Wang, L. J. (2017). A critique on Einstein’s mass-energy relationship and Heisenberg’s uncertainty principle. Physics Essays, 30(1), 75–87.

Whitaker, R. D. (1975). An historical note on the conservation of mass. Journal of Chemical Education, 52(10), 658.

Wilholt, T. (2002). Ludwig Boltzmann’s mathematical argument for atomism. In History of Philosophy of Science (pp. 199–211). Springer.

Wisniak, J. (2000). Amedeo Avogadro the man, the hypothesis, and the number. The Chemical Educator, 5(5), 263–268.

Wiswesser, W. J. (1989). Johann Josef Loschmidt (1821-1895): a forgotten genius. Aldrichim. Acta, 22, 17–19.

Zepeda, J. R. (2009). Descartes and His Critics on Space and Vacuum. University of Notre Dame.

Zumdahl, S. S., & Zumdahl, S. A. (2007). Chemistry (7th ed.). Boston: Houghton Mifflin Company.